Author
|
Topic: Un opened films
|
|
|
|
|
Osi Osgood
Film God
Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted January 24, 2010 05:44 PM
The Problem John, I that you have no idea as to how this was stored.
This film can be just as wonderfully sealed and unplayed as you could ask for, not a speck of dirt or a scratch, but trhat doesn't mean that the color wouldn't be faded.
I bought a "Sports Goofy' 400ft Disney release from the early 80's, still sealed, and it had gone completely pink.
So, your taking a chance that this sealed print could be a pink mess. it all depends on how it was stored. Nowe, if you were to ask this person where he got it, and he was to reply, "this was in the basement of my camera shop for thirty years.", buy it in a second, as you'd be getting the best you ever could. basements tend to stay cool and dry.
Hope that helps.
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian Winchester
Film God
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
|
posted January 25, 2010 09:50 PM
I accept that being sealed will increase the risk of VS but I still doubt that it's substantial link, as I've bought quite a few sealed old films and never found one with VS. As for fade, if you're not sure if a print is likely to be faded, you can probably get the answer by asking here! If the print you refer to is in colour, you must mean the Hammer film 'One Million YEARS BC'. If you have seen the Ken 400' version, it's very likely to be faded. If it's the Walton 200' or 4 x 400' version, it will probably be on Fuji stock which might have some fade, but could be holding up well. I have one that still looks good.
-------------------- Adrian Winchester
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|