Posts: 148
From: Telford England.
Registered: Dec 2011
posted May 09, 2013 03:59 PM
Bought this lens on ebay without really knowing it's exact function. Doesn't fit any of my lenses, so unable to tell it's benefits. Can anyone enlighten me?
Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007
posted May 10, 2013 04:23 AM
Google says Sideral is "relating to the stars".
The ebay seller thinks it's a wide angle projection lens, however, such a lens would never be as long as this, so I suggest it could be an attachment for fitting to a camera to photograph far objects such as stars.
Posts: 118
From: Leoben, Austria
Registered: Apr 2009
posted May 10, 2013 04:31 AM
With only a quick look at the picture I read "SPECIAL" where it says "SPACIAL". I think this confirms what Maurice is suggesting.
Posts: 1269
From: Thetford , Norfolk,England
Registered: May 2008
posted May 10, 2013 06:03 AM
Interesting! The word "Spacial" immediately caught my attention... because I have two boxes of items containing items bearing this word. They are "pseudo" 3-D sets, comprising 6 (one box has only 4) Polaroid spectacles and a lens attachment which produces 2 slightly displaced images of the same frame on the screen, polarized at right angles to each other. This is supposed to provide 3-D movies from ordinary flat ones!!! Needless to say, it doesn't... but the public would vbelieve anything in those days.
"Spacial" is presumably the name of the manufacturer.
( Price on the 18/1/1968 was 11 shillings and 9 pence (Inc shipping), which equate to GBP 0.59 !!!!! Martin
-------------------- Retired TV Service Engineer Ongoing interest in Telecine....
Posts: 3216
From: The Projection Box
Registered: Nov 2006
posted May 15, 2013 12:14 PM
Not really as it will greatly reduce the amount of light on screen. Had one of those in the 70’s and it quickly moved on. They came without projector lens and you had to either work out how to attach it to you existing lens or use a bracket.
Posts: 3063
From: Gt. Clifton,Cumbria,England
Registered: Jan 2012
posted May 15, 2013 03:40 PM
I had something similar, as discussed in a different thread,it only was a single element affair, but was a useful item to have. It and I parted company when a friend of mine,who only had a short throw but wanted big pictures,his need was greater than mine.
Posts: 148
From: Telford England.
Registered: Dec 2011
posted May 15, 2013 04:06 PM
I have to say Lee, that it doesn't "Greatly" reduce the amount of light on the screen, although it lessens it a bit. I think this must be very similar to Hugh's as it is indeed just one lens element. I'm not complaining at £4 plus postage.
Posts: 3063
From: Gt. Clifton,Cumbria,England
Registered: Jan 2012
posted May 15, 2013 06:20 PM
Really there isn't any light loss as such John,it just spreads it over a greater area. I agree that at such a small outlay you've got a nice lens that could "save the day" at a screening event. Well done.