8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Preventing damage to a print

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Preventing damage to a print
Timothy Duncan
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 150
From: Russellville, KY, USA
Registered: Sep 2014


 - posted October 14, 2014 07:59 PM      Profile for Timothy Duncan   Email Timothy Duncan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mr. Duncan has chosen to delete his post.

[ February 01, 2015, 11:43 AM: Message edited by: Douglas Meltzer ]

 |  IP: Logged

Dan A. Caprio
Film Handler

Posts: 71
From: sarasota florida
Registered: Jun 2010


 - posted October 14, 2014 08:35 PM      Profile for Dan A. Caprio     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well Tim
I hate to be the bearer of bad news...But
it was the operators fault always check a print... when it come in.... on bench rewinds.... for hidden surprises...pulled or broken sprockes...bad splices...etc... to avoid above posted symptons... [Frown]

Personally I dislike "automated shreader" projectors for just such problems ...manual projectors are so much easier to spot check prints if necessary and remove without damage.

Dan

 |  IP: Logged

Adrian Winchester
Film God

Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted October 15, 2014 12:11 PM      Profile for Adrian Winchester     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Commiserations - it's always exasperating if something like that happens!

I'm not arguing about Dan with regard to the desirability of checking films, but I wouldn't feel bad about not doing this - I'm sure many of us don't. I often do a check on a 16mm film but I'd rarely bother with 8mm as the majority of films don't have damage that will cause such problems. Autothread projectors are generally convenient and not worth worrying about as a very large majority are of this type and they generally work OK. I don't think a soundtrack on a film used in a silent projector would normally make any difference. Winding tighter on a reel wouldn't help, and there's no point if you're about to screen the film. If nothing similar has happened before or since, it does seem that the film could the problem - if you examine the part where things started going wrong, you might (e.g.) find sprocket damage or a poor splice. At least if you find the film was already damaged, you'll feel better about having to cut it! One question: did you try the projector's loop restorer? If not, doing so quickly may have restored the loops and enabled you to reach the end without stopping, although it's impossible to be sure.

[ October 15, 2014, 07:29 PM: Message edited by: Adrian Winchester ]

--------------------
Adrian Winchester

 |  IP: Logged

Vidar Olavesen
Film God

Posts: 2232
From: Sarpsborg, Norway
Registered: Nov 2012


 - posted October 15, 2014 01:27 PM      Profile for Vidar Olavesen   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've had films spliced with gum, go figure what they though when they did that. Heard about 35mm's being stapled (shudder)

Also had film with splices of "normal" tape and it's gooey and stretchy. Feel with you, most of mine were salvaged without loss of much frames. Elmo's are nice that way, can remove film in mid film. Never had a problem with losely wound film though, only when rewinding, it sometimes overflows the reel

Good luck in salvaging as much as possible of the film

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Schrader
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1628
From: Savage, MN, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted October 15, 2014 08:18 PM      Profile for Jim Schrader   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always run prints in my rewinds before showing if they have never been through my machines and inspect all/any damage/splice as mentioned above it could have been a bad sprocket or splice or an object in the films path I've seen sections of bad sprockets cause problems. I had that happen to a film where the take up arm got to heavy a sagged till it would not turn and caused the film to bunch up I had to cut it out as well and where I cut it was the only splice I carefully flattened the wrinkled film and it ran fine until I replaced it years later.

[ October 16, 2014, 08:18 AM: Message edited by: Jim Schrader ]

--------------------
jim schrader
"Let's see “do I have that title already?"

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted October 15, 2014 10:54 PM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I once got a used film with a metal staple in it! [Eek!]

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Sills
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1423
From: Weymouth,Dorset,England
Registered: Oct 2012


 - posted October 16, 2014 01:05 AM      Profile for Terry Sills     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree that it best to run the film on rewinds to check for damage or splices, but a simple check is to hold the reel of film up to the light and normally you will see any splices or damage. It shows up as dark irregularities compared to the normal undamaged film. If a film is loosely wound onto a reel then this check is not so apparent, in which case I would always rewind it. I'm sure we have all made similar mistakes. It's part of the learning curve of this hobby.

 |  IP: Logged

Maurice Leakey
Film God

Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted October 16, 2014 02:37 AM      Profile for Maurice Leakey   Email Maurice Leakey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is always a temptation to run a newly acquired film, whatever the gauge, immediately, but it must be resisted until it has been thoroughly checked, preferably on a rewind, to ensure it will eventually run OK.
Of the 500 or so films I acquired some months ago I have now completed the Super 8 and have started on the 16mm, but there are still about 130 still to check. It's a job which must not be hurried.

--------------------
Maurice

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mason
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 540
From: Aldershot, Hampshire, UK
Registered: Nov 2013


 - posted October 16, 2014 02:38 AM      Profile for Paul Mason     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you don't already have a set of rewinds which can be difficult to find consider a hand driven or motorised editor viewer with integral rewind arms as these are reasonably plentiful. Elmo made one of the best but other good makes include Minette and Goko.

--------------------
Paul.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominique De Bast
Film God

Posts: 4486
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Jun 2013


 - posted October 16, 2014 03:56 AM      Profile for Dominique De Bast   Email Dominique De Bast   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Timothy, if my message sounds stupid to you, just ignore it but as you say you're not familiar with films, are you sure your film is definitly ruined ? If you cut it to get it out of the projector and only damaged one or two frames (or even more), you may just splice it.

--------------------
Dominique

 |  IP: Logged

Maurice Leakey
Film God

Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted October 16, 2014 09:32 AM      Profile for Maurice Leakey   Email Maurice Leakey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Timothy
Here's something you need to get you started. It's complete and also has a few tapes.
Be aware that the early models did not include facilities for splicing Super 8 films, only Regular 8 and 16mm.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Kodak-Universal-Presstape-Splicer-8mm-S8mm-16mm-/201192920137?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2ed8085449

--------------------
Maurice

 |  IP: Logged

Vidar Olavesen
Film God

Posts: 2232
From: Sarpsborg, Norway
Registered: Nov 2012


 - posted October 16, 2014 10:02 AM      Profile for Vidar Olavesen   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I used to prefer the Kodak splicer too, but the pins on the Super 8 part seem fragile to me. I bought two with broken pins and broke one myself (and wasn't doing anything but using the "pen" to push the tape down on the film. Later I got a nice CIR splicer (Thank you Mark) and this is what I use now. Very nice indeed

http://www.cir-srl.com/products.htm

I think it's the one under Splicers then Splicer for Archive/Video-Transfert and it's the one Super 8 (Inc 3). Plastic, sadly, but expect it's cheaper than a metal one

 |  IP: Logged

Dominique De Bast
Film God

Posts: 4486
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Jun 2013


 - posted October 16, 2014 10:55 AM      Profile for Dominique De Bast   Email Dominique De Bast   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Timothy, I think the best way to train is to sacrifice some leader. There are different kind of leader stock available ; the classical one is the white leader (it allows you to see better in the trajectory inside the projector).

--------------------
Dominique

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Sills
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1423
From: Weymouth,Dorset,England
Registered: Oct 2012


 - posted October 16, 2014 11:15 AM      Profile for Terry Sills     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Timothy
If you need perfect splices, then invest in a CIR splicer. They are Italian designed and are definitely the best and easiest to use. They employ tape (like sellotape) and make perfect splices. The only thing is, is that you will need one for each film guage that you use and they are not cheap. They come up on EBay quite often so don't buy new unless you have a spare arm and a leg. Good luck

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Schrader
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1628
From: Savage, MN, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted October 16, 2014 05:16 PM      Profile for Jim Schrader   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the particular ebay link above is our own janice she is a very honest seller.

--------------------
jim schrader
"Let's see “do I have that title already?"

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2