Author
|
Topic: Early TV Videoed programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Sanders
Film Handler
Posts: 82
From: Bath, England
Registered: Oct 2005
|
posted March 07, 2006 07:37 AM
I'm speculating here, but apart from the frisson of the shows being watched (as well as performed) live, it would probably have been too costly and difficult to film them live directly onto 16mm, due to the multiple cameras involved. There would be a danger of cameras running out of film at crucial moments (though of course kinescopes had to be made with two cameras filming side by side) and the whole thing would have to be edited together at the end (the kinescopes would only require simple joins, though these sometimes occurred in mid-shot!)
Re. my earlier comment about repeats, I should have said that of course kinescopes would be used where possible but I'm pretty sure I've read about cases where entire shows were re-staged live as in the theatre, especially if there was an unexpected hit (so no kinescope had been made of the first performance) or if the kinescope was too poor quality to use.
The latter was the case with the original 1953 Quatermass serial, where they used 35mm Mechau film recorders for the first two episodes, but even on 35mm the result was so bad (an insect got stuck on the cathode ray during the second episode!) they didn't continue, which is why the last four episodes of that serial don't exist today. That series was such an unexpected hit they did consider an omnibus repeat, using a mixture of kinescope and re-staging, but the idea was dropped. It was certainly a process fraught with difficulties!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|