Author
|
Topic: surround sound - question for the AV enriched
|
|
|
|
Rob Young.
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1633
From: Cheshire, U.K.
Registered: Dec 2003
|
posted June 10, 2012 05:59 AM
Wayne, just to back up Bill's reply, in this month's UK publication "Home Cinema Choice", that very question was asked.
Regular contributer and audio guru Richard Stevenson replied (hope he doesn't mind me quoting him);
"Theoretically, an electrical signal does not so much travel down a cable as shunt down it like a Newton's Cradle. This suggests that it would not matter if the cable was five feet or feet metres long, because the signal will arrive at the speaker at pretty much the same time anyway. However, the longer the cable the greater it's resistance, inductance and capacitance. Your amplifier will see quite a different impedance load with a longer cable than a shorter one. As most amplifiers are sensitive to this load, by keeping the speaker cable the same length you will ensure exactly the same performance on each channel. Of course, this is quite tricky in a real-world seven-channel system, so at the very least try to keep the front three main speakers the same length. You may find you can't perceive any benefit at all, but it's better to be safe than sorry."
I've used this philosophy for the last 20 odd years in every system I've put together, ever since I used to sell top quality hi-fi gear and it works for me.
Have fun putting your system together
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|