8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Got an update on Kodak's new super 8 camera... (Page 1)

- UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!  
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Got an update on Kodak's new super 8 camera...
Tom Spielman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 339
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Apr 2016

- posted December 20, 2016 10:23 AM      Profile for Tom Spielman   Email Tom Spielman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I signed up for updates on their website and I received one today. Sounds like Spring 2017.

They also had some sample footage on youtube from an actual prototype. It seemed like they tried to incorporate all the worst traits that Super 8 is known for rather than highlight the quality that is possible. Not sure what they're really doing.

On the one hand, I'm happy that they're apparently really working on it because I had started to believe they weren't. On the other hand, I'm not sure it's a product that will do much to promote Super 8 if it ever does see the light of day.

To take a positive spin, perhaps the jitter and dirty gate were digitally added to make it look like Super 8. Probably more interesting than a 20 second rusty truck video that have been taken on just about any phone. Not sure it's the best way to market the product though.

 |  IP: Logged
Brian Fretwell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1785
From: London, UK
Registered: Jun 2014

- posted December 20, 2016 10:28 AM      Profile for Brian Fretwell   Email Brian Fretwell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And nothing in the shots is moving, why demonstrate cine film with what can be taken with a stills camera??

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Spielman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 339
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Apr 2016

- posted December 20, 2016 10:34 AM      Profile for Tom Spielman   Email Tom Spielman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Having worked for a large company at one point, here's my guess at what happened:

A goal of releasing a camera was set at the beginning of the year. Bonuses were tied to meeting that goal. But it wasn't all or nothing. A functioning prototype meant a partial payout. So they threw something together that could meet the letter of that partial goal if not the spirit.

Also the update mentioned CES 2017 so maybe they had to put something out there ahead of CES in hopes of repeating some of the positive press they got last year.

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted December 20, 2016 11:15 AM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What a joke! [Frown] Kodak are wasting their time if they think that they can promote super 8 with material like that.
Now this is the way it should be done:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nh9BTMWj9M

Kodak need to show that kind of quality with their new camera or it's dead from the getgo.

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged
Alexander Vandeputte
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 243
From: Belgium
Registered: Nov 2009

- posted December 20, 2016 11:54 AM      Profile for Alexander Vandeputte     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think we are comparing apples with pears... First we don't know on what stock the Kodak footage was shot, and how it was scanned, color corrected or not...
The Logmar footage looks incredible but, the image has been tweaked digitally. It was also stabilized, just look at the moving sprocket hole vs the steady image itself and compare with the Kodak footage which has rock steady sprocket holes vs a shaky image...
I remain very excited at the prospect of this new camera and until the opposite is I believe in it's qualities...
But you are right. The Logmar is already out there and it will serve as a reference...

 |  IP: Logged
Daniel Macarone
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 224
From: Summit NJ, USA
Registered: Nov 2015

- posted December 20, 2016 01:53 PM      Profile for Daniel Macarone   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Both samples have impressive resolution, but need better image stabilization. They both suffer from a boat-rocking effect for all shots on a tripod. You'll notice the shots that are static can make you dizzy, feeling just like you're rocking side to side. I wonder if that's in the scanning of both of these. The Logmar has pin registration, but if the result of that is the boat-rocking, then it needs reworking.

 |  IP: Logged
Brian Fretwell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1785
From: London, UK
Registered: Jun 2014

- posted December 21, 2016 03:15 AM      Profile for Brian Fretwell   Email Brian Fretwell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kodak stated on that U-tube page "This footage was shot on the New Kodak Super 8 camera in and around Point Reyes, CA. The images were captured on KODAK VISION3 50D 7203. " So we do know the film stock but not the scanning info etc.

 |  IP: Logged
Maurice Leakey
Film God

Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007

- posted December 21, 2016 03:38 AM      Profile for Maurice Leakey   Email Maurice Leakey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With the name KODAK behind them I just cannot believe that some high-up person/s approved that awful little video. It should be removed immediately.
It will not help to provide many advance orders.

--------------------
Maurice

 |  IP: Logged
Graham Ritchie
Film God

Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006

- posted December 21, 2016 01:34 PM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yikes thats a terrible way to promote a new product [Frown] ...whats with the hair in the gate? Kodak you better post on you-tube something better than this if you want sales [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged
Adrian Winchester
Film God

Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004

- posted December 22, 2016 12:43 AM      Profile for Adrian Winchester     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although it's odd that the video lacks moving images, I think it has been posted to reassure people that that the camera will still be produced, and hopefully something much better will be produced before it appears.

I'm surprised by the aspect ratio of the picture as I thought the MAX-8 aperture meant a 16x9 image, but it looks considerably 'squarer' in the clip.

--------------------
Adrian Winchester

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Spielman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 339
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Apr 2016

- posted December 22, 2016 08:20 AM      Profile for Tom Spielman   Email Tom Spielman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No sound either, other than the recorded sound of the camera.

You're right, I think they just threw something together to reassure people. And they wanted to get it out there before next month's CES where it was so well received last year. I'm sure they will be getting questions.

Based on what we've seen, I think Spring of 2017 is pretty optimistic.

 |  IP: Logged
Rob Young.
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1633
From: Cheshire, U.K.
Registered: Dec 2003

- posted December 22, 2016 09:30 AM      Profile for Rob Young.     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe they're deliberately trying to put people off so that they don't have to make it after all!!? [Eek!] [Roll Eyes] [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted December 22, 2016 10:25 AM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My thoughts exactly Rob!
Anyway you look at this, it does not seem to be anything that one would expect from an iconic company like Eastman Kodak. To me it has all the elements of a 'skunk works' project, a trial balloon as it were, without any of the real financial commitment that one would expect from them.
If Kodak is serious about super 8, forget this camera and just bring back reversal color film, there are plenty of far better cameras out there just dying to run film.

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Spielman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 339
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Apr 2016

- posted December 22, 2016 10:27 AM      Profile for Tom Spielman   Email Tom Spielman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm sure engineers with experience in designing Super 8 cameras are in pretty short supply. Kodak's old cameras were fairly low end, consumer focused models from what I remember. I don't think borrowing from what they've previously done would make sense for a $1,000 camera.

So that means seeking expertise from elsewhere.

As much as I would like it if they brought back color reversal film, I don't see it happening and I can understand why. They've realized (correctly) that anything produced from these cameras will ultimately end up in a digital format. That being the case, color negative film makes more sense. It is much more forgiving of imperfect exposure.

Three minutes of film costs about $45 with processing these days. That doesn't including shipping costs or digital conversion costs. If you're going to spend that kind of money and wait for it to get processed, you want your movie to look good. Otherwise, people will just stick with digital.

What I am a little bit baffled by in Kodak's current Super 8 film lineup is that the only reversal film they make is B&W. And apparently they don't sell a B&W negative film. Why is that?

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted December 22, 2016 10:38 AM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's right Tom, Kodak always made their money from film stock, not cameras and projectors. All of which makes this project the more puzzling. All filmmakers want is for them to bring back reversal color film and processing at a reasonable cost so we can start using those glorious Bolex and Nizo cameras again.
I notice the video says the camera was running at 24fps. If that is the case, then a single cartridge will only last for about 2.5 minutes in the camera! That's going to be a really hard sell at about $75.00 a pop with processing.

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Spielman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 339
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Apr 2016

- posted December 22, 2016 07:21 PM      Profile for Tom Spielman   Email Tom Spielman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In reading some of the comments on the youtube page, I'm now thinking that my judgement of the camera might be a little too harsh. The overscan they did does not give a flattering impression. Properly cropped it would have looked much better.

Properly cropped the movie would have looked much better, if still not all that impressive. The camera's a work in progress.

For comparison, here's a vimeo of a similar overscan done on footage from a Nikon R10, - which is a pretty well regarded Super 8 camera. Not bad for something 40 years old.

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted December 22, 2016 07:26 PM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well Tom, in comparison with your film on the 40 year old Nizo, the new Kodak camera looks like a giant step.....backwards! [Frown]

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged
Daniel Macarone
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 224
From: Summit NJ, USA
Registered: Nov 2015

- posted December 23, 2016 02:38 PM      Profile for Daniel Macarone   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm glad companies are making this effort, but I think they still won't invent the perfect Super 8 camera. There are too many things to include in its features. What one has, the other won't. Old models are still great; Some of them, for example have optical fades in camera, which is nice to see when projecting reversal film. I doubt the new ones will have fades because they intend the film to be digitized and enhanced in post.

 |  IP: Logged
Bryan Chernick
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 654
From: Bothell, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2010

- posted December 01, 2017 03:33 PM      Profile for Bryan Chernick   Email Bryan Chernick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The latest update:

Super 8 Camera Update

 |  IP: Logged
Bill Phelps
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1482
From: USA
Registered: Jan 2009

- posted December 01, 2017 04:26 PM      Profile for Bill Phelps     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One thing I find interesting is the admission that they are having a hard time finding suppliers that can hold such tight tolerances on such a precision mechanism.....it just makes me think of the throw away society we live in now. Must be unable to make anything now that will last very long. Good thing there are thousands and thousands of still working cameras out there that they made 30 plus years ago when such tight tolerances could be manufactured. Maybe the new camera is not going to happen after all......or if it does it won't last very long.

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted December 01, 2017 06:33 PM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't see anybody paying $2,500 to $3,000 for this camera, when you can get a far superior camera off ebay for a few hundred or less.
What's the news on the launch of Super 8 Ektachrome?

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged
Bryan Chernick
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 654
From: Bothell, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2010

- posted December 02, 2017 12:37 AM      Profile for Bryan Chernick   Email Bryan Chernick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They made a test batch of Ektachrome that’s being tested right now. It sounds like they have some testing and possible adjustments to do before it goes into full production.

 |  IP: Logged
Rob Young.
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1633
From: Cheshire, U.K.
Registered: Dec 2003

- posted December 02, 2017 05:33 AM      Profile for Rob Young.     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Smoke & Mirrors.

 |  IP: Logged
Maurice Leakey
Film God

Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007

- posted December 02, 2017 06:23 AM      Profile for Maurice Leakey   Email Maurice Leakey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Two comments made me think.

Clay said "I can hold the camera away from my body." I shudder at the thought of a waving and hose-pipeing image.

Holger said "Film has to be transported 24 times a second." What, no 18fps?

--------------------
Maurice

 |  IP: Logged
Simon McConway
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1085
From: Doncaster, UK
Registered: Jun 2004

- posted December 02, 2017 07:27 AM      Profile for Simon McConway     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kodak is doing far more than Ferannia film.

 |  IP: Logged


All times are Central
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
- Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2