8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » EMPIRE STRIKES BACK COMPARISON TEST

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: EMPIRE STRIKES BACK COMPARISON TEST
Chip Gelmini
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1733
From: Brooksville, FL
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 26, 2009 10:33 AM      Profile for Chip Gelmini     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For only the second time in 2 years, the other night I screened my super 8 scope feature print of EMPIRE STRIKES BACK. It had been so long since the first screening (atleast 6 years), it raised some questions on the quality of the print.

First, the super 8 print:

I believe but am not certain, this is the print from Classic Home Cinema. My copy is acetate and has the German title sequence at the beginning. The soundtrack is English mono. The end credits are English.

The master material to produce the super 8 copy was no doubt a very used theatrical release print. From the 35mm reel changes, the cue marks seemed to be white circles instead of black dots, as if they were punched out from the frames. They were also in the lower right corner of the screen opposite of where they should have been. These reel changes were also very dirty, loaded with spots and speckles that came and went within 15 seconds before/after the joins.

But the one thing that I questioned the most, was the overall exposure of the super 8 print. My copy seems very dark. And I know it had to be the print. But the question is which print?

My friend thought it'd be best to pick up of the original version on DVD(not the special edition). We were lucky enough to find a copy when we went to Best Buy.

Upon screening the DVD:

The picture was indeed cleaner than the film print. It also has the stereo sound to give more power of a show. But as for the darkness, much tgo my surprise there was very little improvement.

So I write this report and ask you this question:

For those who have this same copy, do you agree that maybe Lucas made this film on the dark side, based on the title and story. The Empire does strike back, hence the Dark Side. Whereas the other Star Wars films are better exposed in all scenes.

I believe that my super 8 copy that I actually own is in very good condition with no fading and that problems within the print are from lab or mastering or intentional otherwise.

Correct me if wrong.

Still though, a good movie nonetheless.

~ CG ~

[ February 26, 2009, 11:45 AM: Message edited by: Chip Gelmini ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Clancy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1954
From: Cornwall
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 26, 2009 11:10 AM      Profile for John Clancy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the prints of Empire first appeared before Classic were even around. I purchased mine from a nice dealer in Rayner's Lane (London) about 12 years ago. Initially is had just a single laminate main stripe but Spondon added a balance track for me a few years later. I then re-recorded in stereo from the digital tracks of the NTSC laser disc.

The Super 8 prints are taken from a 35mm print which as usual means the final sell-through prints are too dark. The laser disc releases have much better contrast so I'm surprised to hear the DVD may be somewhat sub-standard in this regard.

All the German prints are on acetate stock with laminate stripe. I'd be very surprised if you ever notice any perceptible fade on any of their prints - as far as I'm concerned they're all on low fade stock. The original Empire prints had better colour than more recent releases which tend to suffer from a slightly muted look. Other than that, they're all pretty darned good... 'Spider-Man' was the best.

--------------------
British Film Collectors Convention home page www.bfcc.biz. The site is for the whole of the film collecting hobby and not just the BFCC.

 |  IP: Logged

Jean-Marc Toussaint
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: France
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted February 27, 2009 12:25 AM      Profile for Jean-Marc Toussaint   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Marc Toussaint   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If it's the same in the US as it is here, the original edit DVD was intentionaly meant to be sub-standard (stereo 2.0, not enhanced for 16x9...) to make the Special Edition look better. Doesn't beat the THX laserdisc.
I haven't seen any of the reels from the super 8 feature but my 16mm LPP print is indeed a tad dark (Thanks the Maker for Xenon)

--------------------
The Grindcave Cinema Website

 |  IP: Logged

Chip Gelmini
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1733
From: Brooksville, FL
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 27, 2009 08:47 AM      Profile for Chip Gelmini     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now a few days after my screenings, I have also realized that I did not watch the correct disc.

The DVD that I got is infact the special edition version (disc one) and the original version is disc two. And here's another twist to this saga....

Disc one: Is set for 16 x 9 and projected well with the Panny.

Disc Two: As Jean-Marc says, is set for letter box and is not 16 x 9 encoded. And when I discovered this, I swapped for the other not realizing I was putting away the one I really should have watched.

Concluding, the review at the top of this post was disc one the special edition of Empire Strikes Back.

Your comments shed some positive thought on this. Thank you all for writing.

And, incase anybody is wondering......I am keeping all 3 copies [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted February 27, 2009 09:58 AM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This series of posts reminds me of a fond memory ...

When Empire strikes back first came out (and I was 14), I went to see it on the first day, and I remember that one shot, from the snow-speeders point of view, going up and over the snow bluffs.

My stomach went up and down during that short bit there and I thought that "this is totally cool!"

The funny thing is ... I have never experienced that since, whether watching flat or scope versions of the film.

Aaaah ... mammaries! Oh, I mean, memories!

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Jean-Marc Toussaint
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: France
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted February 27, 2009 10:22 AM      Profile for Jean-Marc Toussaint   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Marc Toussaint   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, Osi, the same thing happened to me! I saw the film in in 1980 in "Le Rex", the biggest screen in Paris. You really need to be close to the screen, with a really big image to get that feeling again. Or do as I do, try bungee or paragliding. Or something easier: ride Aftershock at Silverwood Theme park.

--------------------
The Grindcave Cinema Website

 |  IP: Logged

Steven J Kirk
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 873
From: Southern England
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted February 27, 2009 01:23 PM      Profile for Steven J Kirk   Email Steven J Kirk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When Empire Strikes Back came out in the UK ( I was 17 ) it showed at the Odeon and a part ran out. When it started again all the audience chanted '7!... 6!...5!... etc'. Those were the days. A few months ago I was at a home screening locally and I met the ex-chief projectionist of the Odeon. Raising this memory with him, he said, 'Must have been my day off.'

--------------------
VistaVision
Motion Picture High-Fidelity

 |  IP: Logged

John Clancy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1954
From: Cornwall
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 28, 2009 03:11 AM      Profile for John Clancy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Osi, I still get that feeling each time. Try standing up when the snow speeders go out to search for the missing heroes, that should do it.

--------------------
British Film Collectors Convention home page www.bfcc.biz. The site is for the whole of the film collecting hobby and not just the BFCC.

 |  IP: Logged

Lars Pettersson
Master Film Handler

Posts: 282
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2007


 - posted February 28, 2009 12:26 PM      Profile for Lars Pettersson   Email Lars Pettersson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...with arms raised above your head. [Big Grin]

Cheers
Lars

 |  IP: Logged

Michael De Angelis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1261
From: USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted February 28, 2009 12:46 PM      Profile for Michael De Angelis   Email Michael De Angelis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
but my 16mm LPP print is indeed a tad dark (Thanks the Maker for Xenon)
J-M,
Please explain the quote. Is it that the Xenon, makes this
dark film print either satisfactory, acceptable or passable?

--------------------
Isn't it great that we can all communicate about this great
hobby that we love!

 |  IP: Logged

Jean-Marc Toussaint
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: France
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted March 01, 2009 02:16 AM      Profile for Jean-Marc Toussaint   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Marc Toussaint   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Between Dagobah and the Cloud City bowels, the film is dark. Cinemascope and large screen really use a lot of light output. My print is good. It turns really great when projected with the Xenon.

--------------------
The Grindcave Cinema Website

 |  IP: Logged

John Clancy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1954
From: Cornwall
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted March 01, 2009 02:54 AM      Profile for John Clancy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I find the same Jean-Marc. Last time I viewed the Super 8 print was with the HTI GS1200 and even the asteroid sequence had detail that had previously been 'missing'.

--------------------
British Film Collectors Convention home page www.bfcc.biz. The site is for the whole of the film collecting hobby and not just the BFCC.

 |  IP: Logged

Oemer Yalinkilic
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 547
From: Berlin, Germany
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted March 03, 2009 03:48 PM      Profile for Oemer Yalinkilic   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, I have also many memories with Empire strikes back.
I was at the german premiere in Berlin. It was screen on the biggest screen in Europe "Royal Palast" (in 70mm), this screen was for his last few years even the biggest screen of the world. Unfortunately this theater is now closed and Germany lost his best Cinema.
Mark Hamill and the director Irvin Kershner were present and I get a atograph from Mark Hamill.
It was very funny because this time was the heydays of Video piracy and I watched the movie 6 months earlier. Curios, the dubbed version on the Video was a little bit different as the official version. Unfortunately this rare old Betamax tape is lost today.
Later I get a 16mm LPP print, but this was a pan and scan version, so I sold it.
Now I have a original 35mm print. As I bought it, the seller told me the color is perfect, but it is not. My print is slightly warm in color. In comparison with the 16mm print, it is very different. The color on the planet Hot was on the 16mm print more blue (a realy cold blue). I think the best quality today are the 16mm LPP prints.
There is a rumor, that they exist 35mm Technicolor prints made in italy in the very last days of Technicolor.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2