8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Fast fade (Page 1)

- UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!  
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Fast fade
Tom Photiou
Film God

Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 02:54 AM      Profile for Tom Photiou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's a cynical question for you.
In the 70s-early 80s when this cheaper film stock became available to dealers to use for release prints, does anyone else out there ever wonder that someone in the industry must has had an idea of how short a life this hopeless stock would have had?
After all, for many years Kodak colour stock used for home movies has proven itself to be so good for decades, we have home movies taken when i was just 8-9 years of age on standard 8 and early teens on super 8 yet not one has any sign of any colour fade. So why fix something that broken and let other companies produce all this trashy stock for what was then very expensive package movies for mass sale?
Or, am i completely off course & not fully understanding? [Confused]

 |  IP: Logged
Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

- posted August 24, 2015 03:07 AM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
I guess the filmstock manufacturing companies knew what they were doing Tom even if they didn't let onto the labs and distributers.
I guess they figured none of these package movies would still be In use by 2015 so the same emphasis for longevity wouldn't apply in the manner it does for people's personal home movies with memories for life stored on them.

What was the saying again...."keep it with kodak!"

Maybe not if it's on Eastman SP!

[ August 24, 2015, 04:11 AM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged
Dominique De Bast
Film God

Posts: 4486
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Jun 2013

- posted August 24, 2015 03:28 AM      Profile for Dominique De Bast   Email Dominique De Bast   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In Belgium, in the eighties two makes of super 8 cartriges were available : Agfa and Kodak. I asked once the difference between both as Kodak was more expensive. The seller told me : if you want to keep your films buy Kodak. If you just do films without long term purposes you can buy Agfa. I did something crazy : I wrote to Kodak and Agfa (no e-mail at that time :-), told them what a seller stated and asked if it was true. They surprinsingly both answered. Kodak gave some technical spécifications and said that they would be better that what competitors offered. Agfa sent me a leaflet with the technical specifications of their film but without any comment...

--------------------
Dominique

 |  IP: Logged
Lee Mannering
Film God

Posts: 3216
From: The Projection Box
Registered: Nov 2006

- posted August 24, 2015 03:40 AM      Profile for Lee Mannering     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've always felt that 8mm printed stock was sometimes carefully chosen with a known user life in mind in order to protect the rights perhaps. The digital arena is another story..

 |  IP: Logged
Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 06:11 AM      Profile for Mike Newell   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Whilst I accept that film stocks will eventually fade I still think where films are stored and conditions surrounding them have a large role in their survival. I was aware of pink films but it wasn't such a big issue as it seems to be today. I have to say as a collector apart from the odd reel you got from a dealer pink film syndrome tended to originate from countries which had more extremes in climate in my case primarily US. I believe you will have more longtivity with Super 8 were the climate is moderate air conditioning is not used and films are stored in dry dark location. The fact that nitrate film sources are still is being discovered in useable conditions in the like of Northern Europe well after logically it should have become unusable years earlier would tend to support this argument. Only a theory but the fact that I had U8 Ken MGM prints up until a couple of years ago with virtually undamaged colour and I stored in ideal conditions makes an argument that it is inevitable in our lifetimes that all pre 82 colour film will fade.
One other thought does film cleaning help or hinder film preservation. One final thought Iis coating film with a cleaner as soon as it was bought part of the reason why my films didn't turn pink. I know I was in the extreme minority to do this as most collectors wouldn't spend the money and there must be a certain health risk to the person using these chemicals.

 |  IP: Logged
Terry Sills
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1423
From: Weymouth,Dorset,England
Registered: Oct 2012

- posted August 24, 2015 06:35 AM      Profile for Terry Sills     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think Mike is correct to an extent. That's why the BFI store film in ideal climatic conditions. But I also believe that Kodak stock is/was superior. Like Tom has said, I too have some old Standard 8 film and the colour is near perfect. I also have some 9.5 colour film, which is even older, and the colour on that is very good. The production of Eastman stock was a disaster. It seems to go red whatever the storage conditions.

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Photiou
Film God

Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 06:44 AM      Profile for Tom Photiou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike, that's all very true but stocks were used which,(as with all business),was offered to companies in mass production of cine films which were cheaper for the reason being what Derek of Derann once described as being fast fade. I think it was Eastman but i cant be too certain.
Once Mr Simmons saw a problem looming they changed to the well known Low fade LPP.
I myself am lucky to have what i believe are almost perfect conditions for my film room, it is very cool all the year round, in the summer it actually feels like its air conditioned, and it is totally 100% dark with no window, yet unfortunately over the last few years i have noticed that a couple,and it is only a very few, of our films we show after the last viewings 2-3 years previous have early signs of fade.
It is of course true to say that the very nature of cine films they will all one day fade, but those supplying companies in the 70s-early 80s that created this cheaper low fade stock were nothing short of scamming the cine collector whilst maximising there profits. Clearly back then the industry would have surmised that super 8 was going to be no more on 2000s onward. How wrong were they?
I just get so annoyed just thinking that if they all stuck to a proven film like the old Kodak, films today would be so much better. If you take Mr Pope selling all those great titles he has but see how red many of the marketing full features are, the Godfather, Rosemary's baby, these titles cost someone a small fortune, there should have been a minimum standard.

 |  IP: Logged
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 08:07 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To answer Tom's question in today's situstion is similar with the situation why there are novels printed on hard cover and soft cover. They both have its own markets.

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged
Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 08:20 AM      Profile for Mike Newell   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is actually a problem for the whole film industry. The rush to cheaper film stock has created a restoration problem of mammoth proportions which we are just one part.

http://www.afana.org/preservation.htm#Storage%20and%20Preservation

http://ian-partridge.com/fade.html

 |  IP: Logged
John Hourigan
Master Film Handler

Posts: 301
From: Colorado U.S.A.
Registered: Sep 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 08:32 AM      Profile for John Hourigan   Email John Hourigan       Edit/Delete Post 
Add to this that Super 8 films, particularly digests from the commercial outfits, were being mass produced in the late 1970s without, what appears to be, a high regard for print quality. My films bought during that time generally suffered from soft focus and subpar sound quality -- sure signs of a "crank'em out" process. It doesn't appear that there was much thought given to aligning the quality of the product to the (high) price of that product.

Ironic that the late 1970s were thought of the halcyon days of Super 8, but it certainly wasn't the best in terms of print and sound quality (as evidenced by those faded/red prints, etc.)

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Photiou
Film God

Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 09:02 AM      Profile for Tom Photiou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just think if Derann had carried on with fast fade stock and put all there big releases on it, Disney features,Terminator,die hard Alien to name but a few. The second hand market would be in a right pickle. I wonder at point Derek Simmons did know something bad, i do remember reading about this years ago and seeing in print that Derek did realise a massive problem for the future and switching to the superior low fade stock.

 |  IP: Logged
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 09:13 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tom, I am afraid you were thinking the current condition for the 1970s scenario. Derann's Disney, Terminator etc were made after 1980s when low fade stock had been in market. But in 1970s it did not exist yet, so the companies needed to use whatever available stock at that time.

As per today, we cannot be asking why cars in 1970s used leaded fuel while it was known dangerous to our health, just because we are using unleaded fuel now.

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Photiou
Film God

Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 09:22 AM      Profile for Tom Photiou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thats very true, what i actually meant was, had Derann not been the good company they were when LPP came out, they could quite have easily carried on useing the cheaper fast fade stock simply to maximise there profits, fortunately for the collector quality played the bigger role so they switched to the better stock at the earliest oppertunity. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 10:12 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
But I think in 1985 the fast fade stocks were no longer available in the market, Tom. It is about the time.

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged
Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 10:31 AM      Profile for Mike Newell   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Eastman color ceased production in 1982. So estimating a two year life span before the supply was used up I would say anything produced 1984 onwards by Derann should likely be low fade. Very lucky for film collectors. Hawk the Slayer was one of the first Derann releases after video decimated the 8mm market. I remember watching it in a friends home cinema in 1986 and it was talked about as the first of new releases. Terrible film but apparently a great seller. Available in 600' digest and full feature length.

 |  IP: Logged
Tom Photiou
Film God

Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 10:45 AM      Profile for Tom Photiou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good info, thanks Winbert & Mike. Bit of relief. [Wink]
Such a shame about those Marketing full length films,they had such good titles.

 |  IP: Logged
Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

- posted August 24, 2015 11:17 AM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Again though Tom, a lot as has been said,must surely be down to storage conditions and climate of the country it's stored in etc as I have quite a lot of the marketing features and mini features and whilst by no means perfect, with the exception of the full feature of Murder On The Orient Express, they don't look like many i see being sold here and elsewhere, where the film has turned totally red. In fact even "Murder..." isn't that bad by comparison.

Same with the ELvis Viacom prints. The ones from the Uk can be still ok I've found where others I've seen from around various points in the globe can be far worse or even totally red.

[ August 25, 2015, 05:45 AM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged
Dominique De Bast
Film God

Posts: 4486
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Jun 2013

- posted August 24, 2015 12:02 PM      Profile for Dominique De Bast   Email Dominique De Bast   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the cine market was stronger, someone would probably have invented a kind of electronic filter to put in front of a projector lens. The classical blue or green filters have varaible effects, depending mostly of the the state of fading. Wittner has a pricey filter on its catalogue and the illustarting pictures you can see on their site are promising but it is expensive to try in cas it dosn't give you best results than a filter you can find for a fraction of the 179 euros asked.

--------------------
Dominique

 |  IP: Logged
Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005

- posted August 24, 2015 01:01 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with Andrew. They must have known the longevity of the stocks they were manufacturing, and just figured that no one would still love these films after decades of video and digital.

A shame, but we have our Agfa, LPP, Fuji and a few other great film-stocks that are holding up fairly well.

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged
Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

- posted August 24, 2015 01:24 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Anything after 82 on the stocks you mention Osi, I would expect to go on for decades yet before any real noticeable fade issues emerge.

Obviously optimum storage conditions with anything like ideal temperature and humidity, will give even greater longevity to our valued prints.

Camera stock from 60's and 70's is still going strong in anything I have in my own collection or in fact have seen of others. Beautiful vibrant colour still.

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged
Brian Fretwell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1785
From: London, UK
Registered: Jun 2014

- posted August 24, 2015 03:13 PM      Profile for Brian Fretwell   Email Brian Fretwell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I imagine that the stocks were originally made for cinema release prints which would be expected to have a short life, once or twice round the circuits before dumping, but were carried over to the "sub standard" (less than 35mm) gauges. We all know the problems that that caused for the industry as some negatives (inter-negatives?) had the same problems.

Kodachrome for home movies had a completely different construction to all others offered so was almost as fade free (if not equally) as imbibition printed Technicolor.

I also remember talking to Derek about some new Kodak print and pre-print stock that was advertised, but he said he was happy with the Agfa that the labs were using. From the prints on Agfa that people here say haven't faded much he was right.

 |  IP: Logged
Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

- posted August 24, 2015 03:23 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Agfa from the later era is very good, just have to put up with a bit more of the bluish cast associated with films like "The Sound Of Music", "Die Hard" and "Fantasia" etc to name but three.

It shows up best when you intercompare prints that were printed on both LPP and Agfa like "Calamity Jane" for example.

Here you can clearly see the difference in colour temperature between the coldish Agfa stock versus the warm LPP varieties.

The good thing with Agfa stock I'm finding is, the colour permanence seems to be about the same, so far at least! [Roll Eyes]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 06:08 PM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well since the Agfa prints have a pretty strong blue bias, maybe they will actually get better (warmer)as they fade! [Smile]

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003

- posted August 24, 2015 06:18 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul, I dont think if bluish prints get faded (warm) it will bring to neutral color as you think. No, I think it will leave the blue tone alone giving the sense of blue and white color. I can say this because I have greenish print that has faded and now becomes green and white print [Razz]

Btw even 1982 Eastman has ceased the production, it iwas already Eastman low fade (Eastman LPP). I have some prints denote with this mark or only Eastman (without LPP) and still no fade. So the fast fade Eastman may be ceased in 1980.

Cheers,

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged
Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

- posted August 24, 2015 06:43 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
????????????????????????
Sorry Winbert, I'm just not getting it....
Ps, Yes I agree Paul

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged


All times are Central
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
- Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2