Posts: 543
From: Herne Bay, Kent. U.K.
Registered: Oct 2011
posted September 22, 2013 12:40 PM
Congratulations to to seller, yes, but more than the cost of a new one from Buckingham!! Not quite as bad as many of the silly prices reached or asked for many other 9.5mm projectors and films. Ken Finch
Posts: 3216
From: The Projection Box
Registered: Nov 2006
posted September 23, 2013 04:32 AM
The Elf claw quick pull down is pretty much a no go area for vintage films as many have found out the hard way and I eventually retuned all my films to project only on a Pathe Vox which is extremely kind to sound films, if upgraded to modern lighting and a new amplifier delivers a good performance in the home even 75 years on... Have a Bolex lens in mine which just about tops it off.
Posts: 452
From: Bromley, Kent
Registered: Nov 2010
posted September 23, 2013 08:57 AM
The last prices for newly converted Buckingham 9.5 in 2010, were- Optical £795 Optical/mag playback £975 Silent (classic RM) £525. They've stopped manufacture now.
Posts: 1704
From: Lancashire, UK
Registered: Oct 2011
posted September 23, 2013 11:28 AM
I agree with lea if pathe could not make a 9.5 no one could in my opinion best stick to the one which has been tried and tested. I still run a black debrie now and again which my father bought new 60 years ago and its still as good as ever
Posts: 452
From: Bromley, Kent
Registered: Nov 2010
posted September 24, 2013 03:25 AM
I'm surprised at the experience of Lee with the Elf conversions, I don't have any personal experience, but have seen them in operation at the 9.5 group and assumed that they had a good reputation, especially as 9.5 prints will naturally be old.