Welcome to the new 8mm Forum!
The forum you are looking at is entirely new software. Because there was no good way to import all of the old archived data from the last 20 years on the old software, everyone will need to register for a new account to participate.
To access the original forums from 2003-2019 which are now a "read only" status, click on the "FORUM ARCHIVE" link above.
Please remember registering with your first and last REAL name is mandatory. This forum is for professionals and fake names are not permitted. To get to the registration page click here.
Once the registration has been approved, you will be able to login via the link in the upper right corner of this page.
Also, please remember while it is highly encouraged to upload an avatar image to your profile, is not a requirement. If you choose to upload an avatar image, please remember that it IS a requirement that the image must be a clear photo of your face.
Thank you!
Interesting this. I have a RM-1 which has the lead stored in the position you describe, Maurice. My RT-1, though, has the lead in a compartment underneath the control surface. Did this change at a certain point in production of all models or is it model specific?
I would assume it's a change with a newer model.
I have a Buckingham 9.5 model RT and the lower cable tray is empty, in fact, it's all turned around so there is no evidence of the cable tray. A conventional 3-pin inlet plug has been affixed to the left end panel.
Here are some pics of a similar model:- https://picclick.co.uk/ELF-EIKI-BUCK...l#&gid=1&pid=1
Thank you Maurice. Its very interesting seeing that converted Elf. I remember seeing Buckingham Films advertisements, using a line illustration, of that machine in Movie Maker. I often wondered what it looks like in photographs. One question is how have the upper and lower sprockets been dealt with? The ones in the picture, although difficult to see, look like ordinary 16mm ones. Surely there must be teeth in the centre of those. What sort of modification was made to the sound head?
In 2003 the price for the Buckingham was £795, the opt/mag playback version was £975. The sprockets have centre teeth as expected.
The biggest job in the conversion is, of course, the optical sound head. As you know, the sound track on 9.5mm is opposite that of 16mm, so a lot of work had to be done for the conversion, including sliding over the exciter lamp.
Also, as 9.5mm sound tracks were not always printed correctly, there is a screw to move the sound assembly sideways to get the best sound reproduction.
I understand that the original 16mm models which had auto-thread had this removed for the 9.5mm conversion.
Thanks Maurice. So I presume the original Elf sprockets are used but cut in half and a new toothed wheel put in-between them? I have no practical experience of 9.5mm so it was interesting to hear about the soundtrack being on the opposite side. That explains the heavy modification. How does the aperture in the gate work considering the different picture areas for sound and silent film? I presume that Elf (like its 50htz 16mm cousins) only runs at 24fps/ no silent speed?
Martin
Not sure how the sprockets were made. I assume silent speed is by sliding over the drive belt. Never done it as I have a 9.5mm Specto.
The Buckingham has a small sliding panel at the gate which shows sound copies as almost square, i.e., blocking off the sound track. The panel is slid over to show a silent film in full frame.
Click to see 16mm sound and 9.5mm sound. Scroll down a bit:- http://www.pathefilm.uk/95flmcat/95flmcatpsndn.htm
Comment