8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » [Video] Core-Recore film without a split reel using "Winbert's Method" (Page 1)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!  
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: [Video] Core-Recore film without a split reel using "Winbert's Method"
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 23, 2014 07:34 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dear all,

It has been a hot discussion for these last two weeks regarding how to core-recore super 8mm film without a split reel.

I then tried myself and making my own video so you can see that it is possible to do this as long as you have those devices mentioned in the video.

This method is definitely different with the method that Osi was explaining, therefore allow me to call this method as "Winbert's method" [Wink]

It is my own "Stenbeck" [Big Grin]

Don't be panic with other devices seen on the video, they are my DJ gears, not film related at all.

Core/Recore films using Winbert method

Please fell free to ask or give comments.

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Spinks
Master Film Handler

Posts: 453
From: Barking, Essex, UK
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted February 23, 2014 08:25 PM      Profile for Paul Spinks   Email Paul Spinks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very impressive.

 |  IP: Logged

Pasquale DAlessio
Film God

Posts: 3523
From: Bristol,RI, USA
Registered: May 2010


 - posted February 23, 2014 09:01 PM      Profile for Pasquale DAlessio     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Excellent Winbert!

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film God

Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted February 23, 2014 10:38 PM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting [Wink] [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Dino Everette
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1535
From: Long Beach, CA USA
Registered: Dec 2008


 - posted February 24, 2014 12:05 AM      Profile for Dino Everette     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yep looks great Winbert. Sadly I do not have any DJ gear so I'm still gonna need to see Osi's method, but good to know there are other options for folks... [Smile]

--------------------
"You're too Far Out Miss Lawrence"

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 24, 2014 02:49 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks guys,

No Dino you don't need to own DJ gears for doing this. Just buy 2 cheap turntables from thrifts store it will do the job.

The idea to put R8mm adapter is to make the super 8mm reel hole narrowed so it will fit good to the center of turntable.

The cost of a 50' reel is almost nothing.

cheers,

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 24, 2014 08:02 AM      Profile for Douglas Meltzer   Email Douglas Meltzer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Winbert,

Fascinating! If only you could core films and lay down beats at the same time.....

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Klare
Film Guy

Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 24, 2014 08:14 AM      Profile for Steve Klare   Email Steve Klare   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If this was Jan Bisterized a little (or maybe a lot...) it could be the very first Super-8 platter system!

--------------------
All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Williams
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 846
From: West Sussex
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted February 24, 2014 12:07 PM      Profile for Mark Williams   Email Mark Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Amazing!!

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted February 24, 2014 12:44 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wish I could get around to getting that video done as quickly as you have done this! Actually, when I get this done, it won't just be how I core films but also showing off my collection.

Good job Winbert!

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Michael O'Regan
Film God

Posts: 3085
From: Essex, UK
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted February 24, 2014 01:27 PM      Profile for Michael O'Regan   Email Michael O'Regan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Innovative.
Well done.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


 - posted February 24, 2014 04:10 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cool! 8mm film playing at 45RPM!

There are two issues here that may or may not be repeatable for others:
- using the 50' reel isn't a true core, and getting a spindle adapter for what Dino has pictured at the top of this thread would be necessary.
- the one turntable I have access to in my life has NO torque. It could do this with zero pressure, and the result would NOT be tight. Winbert, that's a belt drive rig, I presume? Point being, all turntables are not equal in this regard, so buyer beware.

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 24, 2014 06:55 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Bill, thanks for the comment.

Regarding

quote:

- using the 50' reel isn't a true core,

Yes, this is just a quick, easy and cheap solution to Dino's problem for his films on core now.

However, if we cut a half side of the 50' reel (it is an easy work), and when film has been spooled to the 50' reel, we can later flip-flap the base (either a used LP or a turntable slip mat) and getting the film out of the reel. So it is no longer on 50' reel.

quote:
and getting a spindle adapter for what Dino has pictured at the top of this thread would be necessary.
Where is that?

quote:
the one turntable I have access to in my life has NO torque. It could do this with zero pressure, and the result would NOT be tight. Winbert, that's a belt drive rig, I presume?
They are Technics SL-1200MK2. Not a belt driven turntable.

This turntable is not cheap though, just like our ST-1200 (coincidentally, both share the same series numbers [Wink] ). However, I believe a cheap direct drive motor turntable can be bought from a thrift store for $20.

cheers,

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Rob Koeling
Master Film Handler

Posts: 399
From: Brighton, UK
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 26, 2014 07:52 AM      Profile for Rob Koeling     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very impressive Winbert! It made me think of our friends Wallace and Grommit!
Following up from Bill, the set-up would be quite perfect if there was a way to control the tension of the turntable that feeds the film. When I used to make up and break down 35mm prints for a show in the film society that I was involved with, setting the tension on the rewind arm that fed the film, was really crucial in getting the film on core tight enough to be able to handle it, but also not too tight (because that could cause marks on the film). Securing the film on the core with masking tape creates a knot in my belly. Tightening the film on the core by puling it tight makes me even more nervous.... But I think if you can make your set-up a permanent one, you could possibly get it right without any of the above tricks.

>

Dear Osi,
quote:
Wish I could get around to getting that video done as quickly as you have done this! Actually, when I get this done, it won't just be how I core films but also showing off my collection.
it would be really interesting to see your collection, but I don't think that is a priority. However, many of us are very keen to see your set-up for putting films on core. It sounds ike it is even more simple then Winbert's method. You don't have to put a whole feature on cores, just one 600' reel would do nicely.
I counted 18 posts from you since you said that you would do this, so it can't be the case that you don't have any time to spare. I think it would be really good if this topic could be closed and we all move on!
And most importantly, several other collectors would really benefit from learning your trick.

- Rob

 |  IP: Logged

Maurice Leakey
Film God

Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted February 26, 2014 08:31 AM      Profile for Maurice Leakey   Email Maurice Leakey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The secret in tightly making off a 2000' 35mm film on a hand rewind is to have the feed spindle's screw tension fairly tight, and to hold the film's edge with the forefinger of your left hand as it progresses from its start, on its core, to the film's end.

--------------------
Maurice

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 26, 2014 05:00 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
the set-up would be quite perfect if there was a way to control the tension of the turntable that feeds the film. When I used to make up and break down 35mm prints for a show in the film society that I was involved with, setting the tension on the rewind arm that fed the film, was really crucial in getting the film on core tight enough to be able to handle it, but also not too tight (because that could cause marks on the film). Securing the film on the core with masking tape creates a knot in my belly. Tightening the film on the core by puling it tight makes me even more nervous.... But I think if you can make your set-up a permanent one, you could possibly get it right without any of the above tricks.
Thanks for the comments Rob. But I am more a collector without knowing the terminology you are writing. This can be due to a language barrier too due I am not a native English speaker.

Can you tell me if we are rewinding film on a projector will the problem you have mentioned above happen too? Because I don't see any different betwen rewinding on a projector or in my "steenbeck".

Please note that 45RPM is much slower then a spinning in a projector rewinder. Beside the Technics SL 1200 is a quartz turntable so it has a constant speed for every turn. What I see from these features is equal spool making the film is tight enough without need to pull the film. I was in purpose to throw the film on core that hard to show how tight it was. Beside you can also see that the fim was round enough not an egg shape proving it was in good spool. When the video shows I was pulling the film, it was not meant to tight the film but to show that there was no enough space for film getting loose. That was a rubbish film so I was dare to pull the film like that. Should it be my precious collection, I won't do that.

If it is not masking tape what people use to tie the film on core?

Btw guys, this video was made not to answer Osi's thread. So he still has the obligation to proove his words. Osi get your camera and do what I have done.

But please do not continue to debate regarding Osi's method here but instead write in his thread.

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film God

Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted February 27, 2014 02:15 AM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If its like 35mm you wont need masking tape at all...just loop it round your core just once by hand, and pull it tight with your spare hand, while using your other "your finger" to stop it from spinning on the core [Cool] ....its real easy to do.

Generally I would keep masking tape well away from film altogether, as there is always the risk of some residue from the masking tape adhesive getting on the film.

Graham.

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted February 27, 2014 03:50 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Graham, it is fully understand if you are talking 35mm since it has wider surface hence more stable. But with 8mm width film can be easily fall apart especially if it is 1200' high. Am I right?

As for the masking tape, I think that is the reason it is used for masking because it doesn't leave residue. At least that what I see with "3M" brand I was using. Should other brand leave residue it would be on the edge side, right? Will notgive any impact to the picture. Anyway just buy "3M" [Wink]

Cheers,

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film God

Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted February 27, 2014 12:26 PM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Winbert...

Just a thought with Super 8, If you are putting the film on cores, then why not just cut up some bits cardboard to place on either side of the film to support it....a bit like making a sandwich, but with the film on the middle then wrap it up with masking tape, that way its safe.

Graham.

 |  IP: Logged

Fabrizio Mosca
Master Film Handler

Posts: 346
From: Milano, Italy
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted February 27, 2014 12:49 PM      Profile for Fabrizio Mosca   Email Fabrizio Mosca   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Winbert, how do you deal with the static electricity? Looking at the film, whatever kind of mat you use the film may be charged with static and I don't think that this may be fiendly with the magnetic track [Smile]

In any case, I wish I had another turntable (I already have a SL-1300 [Big Grin] )!

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted March 01, 2014 02:42 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Fabrizio, the electric static is too small to erase the soundtrack on magnetic track.

Of course you must have been aware that printed picture will not be effected with the electric static, no matter how strong it is, right?

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Fabrizio Mosca
Master Film Handler

Posts: 346
From: Milano, Italy
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted March 01, 2014 03:25 PM      Profile for Fabrizio Mosca   Email Fabrizio Mosca   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know how electric static may affect the developed picture, apart from attractng dust onto the film.
As far as I read, it may affect raw film stock when you wind them, as it may create sparkles in total darkness, thus impressing the film.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Phelps
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1482
From: USA
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted March 01, 2014 04:48 PM      Profile for Bill Phelps     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I was going to say the static electricty would be a dust magnet.

[ March 10, 2014, 03:51 PM: Message edited by: Bill Phelps ]

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted March 10, 2014 11:44 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I don't know how electric static may affect the developed picture, apart from attractng dust onto the film.
Electric static will not effect the developed picture. As for attracting dust, some film cleaner has anti-static properties. So that should not be a problem, I guess. More over, the electric static from the Turntable is also too small (plus there is a slip mat there before the platter).

I wrote this in the other forum that super 8mm film collecting is (an almost) gone hobby. We have to use our creativity to reach the result, not only relying on the available tools.

For those who live in big countries must be lucky with abundant sources of film related things, but I live in Indonesia, a developing country with limited sources. If I only think about a split reel (and only a split reel) to wrap film outside the reel, I will never reach that.

Another example, I know splicing film is best to use perforated tape + a splicer or film cement. You know what I am using here... "super glue"!

For me is the final result, not what tools you are using!

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted March 11, 2014 05:49 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Couldn't I wreck my turntable doing this? After all, it's not designed to spin anything heavier than an album.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2