Author
|
Topic: Bolex SM8 thoughts etc
|
|
|
|
Simon Wyss
Film Handler
Posts: 78
From: Äsch, Switzerland
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 26, 2009 04:34 AM
Bolex-Paillard never had great luck with their projectors.
Bogopolsky already had the Berne company Stoppani build “his” first models, when in Geneva.
Then the G, gee!, what a faulty design. Claw wrongly spaced from the aperture, film gate a nightmare to inspect and clean.
After WW II they had to go license, so from 211/221 on fancy apparel but falling behind the upcoming German competition (Siemens & Halske “2000”, Bosch-Bauer P 5).
The M 8 is something more valuable, although without reverse action. The 18-5 is funny but unfortunately not running faster.
Everything later was Italian (SM 8 from Silma, Torino) or Austrian (SM 80 and the like from Eumig, Wien). The SM 8 has an absolute crap drive unit that squeezes the belt (actually only a O-ring).
One has to differentiate well because the Paillard-Bolex projectors do have many interesting details and advantages. Question is whether they weigh up against the odds.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|