Author
|
Topic: What is the worst scratching projector made?
|
Osi Osgood
Film God
Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted January 13, 2010 04:02 PM
OK, this ought to be fun!
We've often talked about the kindest projectors to film, but what, in your opinion, is the absolute worst scratching projectors?
The "classic" projector, (I'll explain that later), would be the "Soundstar", it left deep scratches on me precious prints. Sears projectors were pretty awful as well ...
but the worst all time "projector" I have ever ran into, was a little thing made near the end of Super 8, (classic era). It was a "Bentley" projector. It really wasn't an editor, as it had nothing to edit/plice with. I don't have a picture of it, but it was fashioned after the look of the portable TV's of the late 70's/early 80's. The top would open, and you would place in and thread a 200ft reel (it wouldn't take a 400ft reel) and you would watch the film on a little screen like an editor would have. It didn't use electricity, and you couldn't plug it in. It only took batteries. I suppose they marketed this as being handy. Perhaps you could take it to the mountians and watch movies?
Anyhow, this little projector that I bought scratched films in such a terrible way that I was completely astounded! TERRIBLE!
If anyone has a photo of it, please put it up?
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Barry Attwood
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1411
From: Enfield, U.K.
Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted January 14, 2010 01:37 AM
Well here in the U.K. (I can't say for the rest of the world) the product name CINEREX still makes me shiver, whatever model came out, they had terrible plastic pathways. I remember way back in 1978 when I was looking round for my first projector, I was shown this nice looking 8mm projector, he could see I might be interested, so he asked me if I would like a demonstration, and I said yes, of course. He had no used prints around, so he got a BRAND NEW & SEALED print of a "Mighty Mouse" cartoon off the shelf, run it through the machine, everything seemed to be going well with his sales pitch, then he said the unthinkable, would I like to see the projector running again, so after re-winding the film, he laced it up, and turned the machine on, and on the same print I had just watched were 2 THICK GREEN LINES down the centre of the picture, well at the time I might have been a bit naieve about 8mm, but not THAT NAIEVE not to see the green lines, and know something was very wrong, so I thanked him for his time, and made a swift exit right, if you know what I mean.
It's funny but my service agent reckons the motors on the CINEREX machines were one of the best made, shame about the rest of the machine!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Paul Adsett
Film God
Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted January 14, 2010 08:24 AM
I agree with Dino, Pathe Baby's can be 'reel' scratchers, but we love them anyway!. The brake arm on the Pathe Ace is also responsible for scratching probably thousands of 9.5mm reels, and Pathescope never fixed the problem (which would have been very simple to do) in the 30 year production run of that very popular machine! Pathe's in general are rough on film. On the 8mm front, the worst scratcher I had was a late model Bell and Howell, although I forget which model it was - certainly NOT the great 606h/Regent
-------------------- The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection, Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|