Author
|
Topic: 7th Voyage Sinbad, a question
|
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God
Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted September 15, 2005 07:16 PM
I just acquired this title from Ebay, from the seller who once we knew always "too honest" in stating the film length. As s result, the normal buyers like me got confused on the original spool when the first time it was released. In his description, he says 2 x 500".
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6431551552
I found at the old threads about this Sinbad, but do you think this Sinbad came from the 200" reelers? If it is so, why it is now 2 x 500"? Weren't those Sinabds released on 4 reeler x 200"?
Apart from that, since the seller wrote "JP Law" after the title, is this the same famous Sinbad as we had ever discussed?
I just straight bought it without asking the seller, since he lives close to my region and the price too was so tempting.
I invite the CSI Ulm to come...
Cheers,
-------------------- Winbert
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God
Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted September 18, 2005 02:10 AM
Hi guys, I just got a confirmation from the seller that the reels size respectively are 207mm (8.15 inch). As far as I know, 400" reel is 7 inch....so this is 600" reel, isn't it?
Ok.....so I followed Andreas' techniques in analyzing the reel.
Here we go...
From the picture, it can be seen that the film has almost taken all capacity and even the perforations can be seen on the edge of the plastic reel. So.. if it is 600" reel and as we have all known that a company released 200" reel, mostly, the actual length was only between 150" - 175".
So it means, it COULD be that all 4 reels Sinbad are in each 600" reel, couldn't be it?
The seller's main business was actulally selling the records (LPs) and he was selling 8mm on behalf of someone in Australia. That's why in all his auctions, he mentioned the length of the films in the weird way like that.
I just hoped that since there are 2 x 600 reels on the auction, that both SINBADS are actually there... in this case it wil be more cool
Perhaps, he put the title, i.e. 7th Voyage Sinbad, on the auction merely based on the label found on the case. And when someone was asking the confirmation, he then screened the second reel, which was "Golden Voyage", and therefore he corrected it.
But because of his correction on the title, no one placed the bid more than US$11.50.
I am really now crossing my finger, that it happened
In this case then...it would be a loud HOOOOORRAAAAYY!!!
I will let you know when it arrives.
Cheers,
-------------------- Winbert
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|