8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Inventing a projector (Page 4)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!  
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Inventing a projector
Phil Murat
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Villeneuve St Georges, France
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted December 13, 2015 03:27 AM      Profile for Phil Murat   Email Phil Murat   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 


[ December 14, 2015, 01:29 AM: Message edited by: Phil Murat ]

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted December 13, 2015 03:30 AM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
My films don't come into contact with this guide either once threaded, but either way, I've had no problems with this guide nor can see any wear to it.

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011


 - posted December 13, 2015 09:59 AM      Profile for Paul Browning   Email Paul Browning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Phil, you lost me a bit here, are you saying the hub is a knurled screw on part, a threaded separate part. This would make more sense really, as for using air cans, well once held in the hand for a few minutes, the compressed air that suppose to come out turns into water vapour, not a good idea around film guides or film for that matter, only used one once, waste of time and money. A set of artist brushes modified with sable hair or bristles are better and cheaper. The guide I refer to phil, is flat, it has no relief in the middle, so if the film comes into contact with it, it will touch the film across the full width, I suggest you look at this again, and if anything check for wear. This looks very similar to a part on the Elmo gs 1200 that should be modified, a front top guide that turns the film upward and over the top cog when lacing up the projector, it wears very flat and scratches the film, a don't believe the plastic on the beaulieu is of better quality, its something I will be changing on mine soon.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted December 13, 2015 10:45 AM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Paul, the only plastic guide that stays anywhere near the running film once threaded on the Beaulieu, is the top sprocket lower input guide with an adjusting screw fitted to it.

This has to stay in close proximity to the film to allow the loop to be continually formed, and secure the film sprocket holes within the actual sprocket.
It has to be set to two acetate film thicknesses in order to ensure it cannot harm your prints.It has a tiny set screw fitted to the inside of this guide to allow for this adjustment.

If this is adhered to, no scratch problems occur from these. They are renowned for having a very precise non scratch film path when everything is how it should be.

I occasionally use compressed air on my film gate to thoroughly clean inside and out. It gives a much cleaner film frame after these occasional interventions, but you do have to allow time for steel guides to return to room temperature before refitting the lamp and lens I find.

For everyday use, I also use a photographic soft blower brush as well as a short stubby firm brush for cleaning the fixed side of the gate aperture plate.
I have not experienced any problems with excessive moisture if the can is inverted and given a quick burst prior to using on the projector.

These machines,I find, do tend to pick up every stray particle or fibre in the air just because of its open gate design.
The Fumeo has the better idea I reckon by having a similar open swing gate design, but then gives it its own independent cover for the gate besides the ones they both have for the lamphouse.

This would further reduce the claw noise as well as protecting the gate more fully from the ingress of atmospheric particles had the Beaulieu design featured the same.

A clip on neoprene lined fitted removable cover around the gated area would give these machines a further improvement I feel, while we are reinventing the wheel here! [Big Grin] [Smile]

[ December 13, 2015, 01:49 PM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Murat
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Villeneuve St Georges, France
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted December 13, 2015 10:54 AM      Profile for Phil Murat   Email Phil Murat   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 


[ December 14, 2015, 01:34 AM: Message edited by: Phil Murat ]

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011


 - posted December 13, 2015 12:22 PM      Profile for Paul Browning   Email Paul Browning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think the fumeo design is any better than the beaulieu design here, especially around the gate area for dust or airborne particles being drawn into this area, there's not much difference from what I can see, I still wouldn't use one of those aerosol cans though, a brush is better. I still don't get the mechanism on the take up reel Phil, I feel its lost in translation a bit, its looks like the knurled part would act like a grinding wheel acting on the inside of the reel if it came into contact with it, is the diameter bigger to secure the reel?.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Murat
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Villeneuve St Georges, France
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted December 13, 2015 12:51 PM      Profile for Phil Murat   Email Phil Murat   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
High paul,

Here is,

A Reel installed :

 -

The Thumb Scew removed :

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted December 13, 2015 12:56 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Good photo,makes everything perfectly clear Phil thanks.

The locking tab ones are very good as fitted to the HTI and Studio models. Quick and easy to fit even the largest of reels but act as a wedge also when securing the full and very heavy 2200ft reels.

 -

 -

And of course,others have found there own ingenious solutions:

 -

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011


 - posted December 13, 2015 01:18 PM      Profile for Paul Browning   Email Paul Browning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A picture speaks a thousand words, I understand how it works now. The later design is better, yours is a good compromise Phil, and the lower roller guide is changed too, so there was a problem/improvement done to them.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted December 13, 2015 01:22 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
That's just somebody's ingenious home modification again Paul.
They were never sent from factory this way and you can still see where the pivot point was including the gap now in the frame from where the original roller was which Beaulieu fitted.

Agreed though, the ones shown here from the HTI/ Studio models are the ones to mimic or certainly very similar.
Three drive keys would be prefered by myself come the time. Never liked just the one location key let alone when it is a tiny dowel like these used here.

[ December 13, 2015, 06:18 PM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Murat
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Villeneuve St Georges, France
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted December 13, 2015 01:44 PM      Profile for Phil Murat   Email Phil Murat   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes Paul, you can find different solutions.

I will modify my second BEAULIEU like the first one using the same solutions as they give full satisfaction for all the points.

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Fritz
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: Burnsville, MN, USA
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted December 13, 2015 04:08 PM      Profile for Barry Fritz   Email Barry Fritz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would opt for a slot load projector. Film is put into the slot and take-up by hand and then throw the switch. Works very well. Nice thing about it is that it is just as easy to untread if needed. Most auto threaders are a pain to unload. Slot loaders were popular in later 16mm projectors and I love them.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted December 13, 2015 07:15 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Do you find yourself wanting or indeed having to unload a film mid run often Barry?

Aside from demonstrating the equipment on one or two very isolated instances, I cannot think of an occasion where I've either wanted to, or indeed needed to interrupt a screening.

After all don't we gauge each film we project with the time we have to do it in?

It can be done on any of the autothread machines I have in around 2-3 minutes if I have to,but it isn't something I put into practice often.

I hate even having to pause a film let alone stop it altogether halfway through if something just so happens to interrupt my viewing, like the doorbell or the phone ringing for example!

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Fritz
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: Burnsville, MN, USA
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted December 13, 2015 10:22 PM      Profile for Barry Fritz   Email Barry Fritz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In practice, not very often Andrew. Still, when I have needed to with autos, it can be a pain. Also, auto need to have the starting tip of the leader trimmd in a particular way and if the tip has a tendency to curl a bit due to prolonged time on the reel, that will cause problems also. Lastly, as someone mentioned earlier, the catching of the film by the take up reel is sometimes hit and miss. Slot loaders have none of those problems.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Murat
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Villeneuve St Georges, France
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted December 14, 2015 01:44 AM      Profile for Phil Murat   Email Phil Murat   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
High Barry,

According to your proposal, a Hand Threading is something to consider, providing it stays an easy way to do.
If Hand threading is maintained it has to be 100% safe and easy to incorporate.

To be note hand threading will simplify the engineering of the machine.

Did you find somewhere a satisfactory Power LED solution to replace former Quartz Buld, that should be a big step ahead ?

Kind Regards

Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Adsett
Film God

Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted December 14, 2015 09:24 AM      Profile for Paul Adsett     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm with Barry on this one. I much prefer hand threading the film, where you can form your own loops and you know for sure that that nothing is going to scratch or accordion the film when you power up. That is why I trust my precious 8mm home movies only to the Bolex 18-5, which you can hand thread in about 15 seconds, and it never damages the film.
Also totally unnecessary IM0, is still frame capability. I have never used it in 50 years!

--------------------
The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection,
Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade
Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar
Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Fritz
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: Burnsville, MN, USA
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted December 14, 2015 09:39 AM      Profile for Barry Fritz   Email Barry Fritz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Phil, Paul:
Actually, slot loaders are not manual threaders. You just put the film in the slot and turn the machine on. With manual threaders, you do have to go over each sprocket and lay the film in the film gate correctly, making sure upper and lower loop are correct. Even so, as Phil said, the design of the Bolex 18-5 with the swing open gate is perfect. Very, very easy and almost foolproof. I don't think I ever saw a slot loading 8 or super 8mm projector. Here is a 16mm slot loader.
 -

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted December 14, 2015 10:41 AM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
I like the autothread mechanisms on the machines I use. They serve me reliably (when not faulty to begin with!).

Once these work as designed, I never have an issue.
Sure on machines like the Beaulieu you assist the leader of the film onto the take up reel, but that is it. Nothing else needs manual intervention.
The correct dovetail trimmer is used on both the Bauer and Beaulieu machines so each film I have only ever needs trimming once.
I can see it would be a pain in the backside though if you switched say from an Elmo to Bauer as you would keep needing to use the bevelled edge trimmer each time you were using the Elmo.
With manual thread or slot loading machines, all actions are done by hand from the initial feed to placing the leader onto take up reel.

I see that a Fumeo for example would be fine to manually lace each time for a 750m feature film, but to me, it would become a complete pain if I was watching 5x 200ft shorts or worse still 50ft trailers!

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film God

Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted December 14, 2015 11:17 AM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Barry

I have a couple slot loaders as well, B/H being one and think they are great, real easy to thread, much better than auto feed [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Murat
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Villeneuve St Georges, France
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted December 15, 2015 02:26 PM      Profile for Phil Murat   Email Phil Murat   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An other idea.......

"Making up from start to finish" a new design projector couln't be the job of a man alone. Many different specialties are involved in the Job, as Basic Mehanic, Electronic, Cinematic, Optical, Design, etc...etc.
There are some specialists for each of them, anybody can have skills or ideas to bring , whether he is a specialist or not.
Aim should be to put the Super 8 machine in the current age , taking benefit of the best technologies available . Just an Exemple :

It should be great that the New machine features a "Malt Cross" film driving System. This is an expensive system to releaze due to precision requested for each item entering composition.
(I choose this exemple assumming Claw system or "Malt Cross" system is a strategic item.)

Now, imagine same device made around an Electronic "Malt Cross", whith no more "malt cross" necessary in fact :
Just a "Step to Step" Motor joined to an electronic regulated motion.
Now, is it safe enough, at first glance no ? and you are right...

Exept you just need a Triple Chanel Electronic Pilot Module.
Each Chanel is speaking with each others, comparing their datas in the same time. One Channel is the Master. If any Channel doesn't agree, it is immediatly put on the side, the others Chanels working properly, your machine keeps running perfectly , without any change.

This kind of concept is common now for professionnal sytems.
That it wasn't possible to do in the past for reasonnable money, is possible now.

Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted December 15, 2015 03:00 PM      Profile for Mike Newell   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Phil

You can dream but what you are proposing is never going to happen in real world.

Mike

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Murat
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Villeneuve St Georges, France
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted December 15, 2015 03:14 PM      Profile for Phil Murat   Email Phil Murat   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
High Mike

All New Generation aircrafts are right now flying safely due to "Triple Channels" Flight Control or Engines Control Systems; showing an outstanding reliability.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted December 15, 2015 04:51 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Mike and Phil are both correct I feel on this.

Mike is correct in saying we are never realistically going to install state of the art PLC industrial logic control on any of our machines,budget and technical support would not allow this.

However Phil is equally correct in saying there are unbelievable advancements in technology since when our machines were manufactured that could be implemented in cost effective way, that rely on nearly no technical support and would turn our machines into far superior machines than they currently are.

It's a little like the way in which every car pre 90's used points and a distributor, now its all done electronically, very cheaply and is a throw away part.

My coil pack for a Ford Focus has failed twice in 14 years. It costs 40 something pounds for a copy part and once fitted see's the car running spot on for another 5 years or so.

How often were we all there with our emery cloth and feeler gauges cleaning the 4 or 6 contact terminals within the distributor cap and rotor arm, then cleaning the points before setting the gap again with feelers just ensure a chance of a reliable winter start
in the 70's & 80's?

Even the platinum plugs used nowadays seem never ever to fail!
I have used one set for 8 years, no problem at all!!

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted December 15, 2015 06:02 PM      Profile for Mike Newell   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think we need to clarify. Are we talking replacement or enhanced parts for existing projectors or the development of a new super 8 projector with enhancements built into it that have occurred since the last machines were manufactured 40 odd years ago. I won't even list the reasons why there will never be a new projector as you all already know them. It is possible that small parts could be produced to replace those that are worn but even that is economically unrealistic with an abundant elephant graveyard of spare and surplus projectors already in existance than could be cannibalised or brought into service when a projector finally passes beyond repair.

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Fritz
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: Burnsville, MN, USA
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted December 15, 2015 07:03 PM      Profile for Barry Fritz   Email Barry Fritz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike: I think Edwin van Eck might disagree with your. He has already created many replacement parts using a 3D printer. Those that I have seen on his web site and this forum look very impressive.

I think Phil meant to say "Maltese Cross" intermittent system. It is also know as a Geneva drive system. It is superior to the claw intermittent and was common in 35mm format projectors. I had a DeVry 16mm projector with the Geneva drive that I just recently sold. Very costly to make.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2