8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 16mm Forum   » Using an Anamorph designed for 35mm? Any disadvantages?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Using an Anamorph designed for 35mm? Any disadvantages?
Claus Harding
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted February 05, 2008 04:58 PM      Profile for Claus Harding   Email Claus Harding   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I see them for sale and I am wondering if they would be an improvement over my regular Sankor?

While I am well aware of the quality of glass involved, am I overlooking anything obvious in terms of optical design or incompatibility with the 16mm format that would negate any advantages?
I am aware that minimum focus on some of these is about 20 feet and that's fine for my purposes (25ft throw.)

Apart from the fact that these beasts are the size of small coffee cans, would one of them be a good improvement in front of my Eiki?

Thanks for any and all advice,

Claus.

--------------------
"Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)

 |  IP: Logged

Jean-Marc Toussaint
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: France
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted February 05, 2008 06:26 PM      Profile for Jean-Marc Toussaint   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Marc Toussaint   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Claus, focus isn't the only problem you have to worry about. Using these lenses with a short throw prime might project a "tunnel" effect ie- sides of the image will appear round because the length of the scope lens barel is acting as a mask. No problem with a longthrow prime lens, though. At 25ft, you should go with a 35 or 40 mm prime for a 10 to 12ft wide scope image.

--------------------
The Grindcave Cinema Website

 |  IP: Logged

Claus Harding
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted February 05, 2008 07:08 PM      Profile for Claus Harding   Email Claus Harding   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jean-Marc,

If I understand, are you saying that a 35mm prime on up is fine if I want to avoid vignetting (35 is what I use for 'scope) or is that still too wide?

Claus.

--------------------
"Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)

 |  IP: Logged

Jean-Marc Toussaint
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: France
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted February 06, 2008 02:05 AM      Profile for Jean-Marc Toussaint   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Marc Toussaint   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You should be, but then again if you want to use one of the Isco monsters (they are nearly one ft long), trouble might occur.

--------------------
The Grindcave Cinema Website

 |  IP: Logged

Claus Harding
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted February 06, 2008 09:52 AM      Profile for Claus Harding   Email Claus Harding   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jean-Marc,

Point taken; I think I'll stay with my regular ones until such a day when I have a throw long enough to be able to consider something like the Iscos without worry.

Thanks again for your excellent advice,

Claus.

--------------------
"Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2