Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Blu-Ray did you watch last night?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ed Gordon
    replied
    Last week I watched the new animated feature, Flow. It won the Academy Award for Best animated feature film yesterday.

    How ‘Flow’ turned a $4 million budget into an animated work of art

    The filmmakers used open-source software to create an unexpectedly fresh animation style.

    Nearly every still of the animated film Flow, directed by Latvian filmmaker Gints Zilbalodis, feels like an art piece that could stand on its own. The movie—which centers around a group of animals surviving in a post-apocalyptic, human-less world—combines the edge-of-your-seat feeling of a survival video game with the painterly brushstrokes of an Impressionist artist. And, somehow, it manages to be a tearjerker without any dialogue at all.

    Flow made its global debut at the Cannes Film Festival back in May. Since then, it’s raked in a series of awards, including the feature film grand prize at the Ottawa International Animation Festival and the Best Editing and Puerta América prize at the Seville European Film Festival.

    Zilbalodis’ first film, Away, was released in 2019 to generally positive reviews—a considerable feat, given that he was the sole animator behind the final product. Flow started similarly, with just Zilbalodis and, his laptop, and a concept, five years ago. Zilbalodis eventually onboarded a limited crew of less than 50 creatives, with an even more limited budget, of around $3.8 million.

    Part of the secret behind its low cost, Zilbalodis says, is that the entire project was made on Blender, a free and open-source 3D modeling software that can run on most laptops. Despite the project’s constraints—or perhaps, in part, because of them—Flow feels like a breath of fresh air in an animation landscape that’s increasingly focused on realism.​
    Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/91232740...ed-work-of-art

    Here is a clip from the movie:



    The Trailer:



    It is available on several steaming services. I don't know if there are plans to release it on disc.

    This is a movie that can be enjoyed by all ages. Since there is no dialogue, there is no need for subtitles.

    Leave a comment:


  • Osi Osgood
    replied
    We watched "The Searchers" last night. A really good restoration was done on this film, and it didn't hurt that it was taken from the VistaVision masters. The detail is really amazing!

    Leave a comment:


  • Graham Ritchie
    replied
    Back to the 90s tonight with the action packed blu-ray of "The Rock"

    Leave a comment:


  • Graham Ritchie
    replied
    Watched "The Gift Horse" blu-ray the other night, very good WW2 movie based on a true story, tonight and after watching the evening news and seeing what is going on international wise, I needed to watch something to cheer me up, so it was "Ma Vi En Rose" on DVD, actually I think this film is very well done, English sub-titles mind you which I don't mind, it certainly brought a smile back to my face.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian Fretwell
    replied
    Last night I finished off the box setof the Gerry Anderson puppet series Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons. 1300 in 25 min episodes minutes so it was waht I have been watching on and off for some time. Made on 35mm this looks very good in HD and the cured the bad puppet waks by either not showing the legs when characters moved or used moving floors. I had forgotten that part wat through the series they changed the end theme from just music and a voice saying Captain Scarlet to a song. I remembered an amalgum of the two!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Graham Ritchie
    replied
    Well folks long before "Raiders Of The Lost Ark" there was this one released by "Imprint" I watched this blu-ray a few weeks ago and enjoyed it, both picture and sound were very good.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1390977.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	113.5 KB
ID:	112988
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1390978.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	231.3 KB
ID:	112989

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Klare
    replied
    Yes, their take on AI was presented kind of subtly, but it made its point! There is always that fear of "when it can start making itself..." and in this case we saw the first garden gnomes capable of reproduction! (-by Manufacture: this is a Family Movie!)

    I would like to have seen this one in a theater, but that simply wasn't an option in this case: there's a multiplex near us next door to a Nathan's. Coupl'a hot dogs and this movie would have been a nice night out!

    -but we did the best we could at home.

    Leave a comment:


  • Douglas Meltzer
    replied
    Adding to the Wallace & Gromit opinions, I thought Vengeance Most Fowl was brilliant. Wildly entertaining even when making points about AI & technology, I laughed out loud throughout the film.

    Leave a comment:


  • Osi Osgood
    replied
    We watched two John Wayne classics, Big Jake and the Searchers. Ironically, the DVD that we have,, is almost right up there with the Blu-ray in quality, but I think that this is because our Blu-ray player upgrades any DVD to look great. Now, the Searchers is a real revelation! The film was painstakingly restored just recently, and I'd swear that it almost looks too good. It's brought out of the 1950's, and quality wise, it's right up there with films these days. Stunning. Big Jake also benefits from it originally being shot and processed by technicolor, so all the prints look awesome in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Moors
    replied
    I cannot understand how anyone can say the ‘Wallace and Gromit, Vengeance Most Foul’ was just going through the motions, or that Ben Whitehead’s Wallace was soulless? It looks ‘great, too great?? I think in this digital age people can’t just sit and enjoy anything without making a list of things they didn’t like. We all thought it was excellent.

    I remember reading a review of Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny where someone said ‘Not the Indiana Jones I wanted’? Well tough, again I thought it was great. I went a lot to the Cinema in the 60’s and 70’s. People used to just enjoy films for a good night out. They didn’t debate detail like today. Why can’t people just enjoy things for what they are?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian Fretwell
    replied
    I have a feeling that the death of one of the scriptwriters between the last one and this also had an effect on this one - Bob Baker, one of the so-called "Bristol Boys" who often wrote TV scripts together.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Klare
    replied
    Liking a film or not is a very subjective thing, Ed.

    -agree to disagree!

    At the very least I rank this one ahead of Curse of the Were-Rabbit.
    Last edited by Steve Klare; February 25, 2025, 08:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ed Gordon
    replied
    Originally posted by Steve Klare View Post
    Tonight on the big screen: Wallace & Gromit, Vengeance Most Fowl

    We had to stream it: film prints have been...delayed for some reason! We ran about 20 feet of HDMI cable across the floor and made sure my wife's flat-screen worked again once we were finished!

    It was really good!
    I have been a Wallace & Gromit fan for years and I found this latest effort to be ok, but it was not up the the standards set by previous releases. I have all older ones on disk so I can watch them again and again, not but this one.

    Another fan's review is below. I agree with his conclusions.

    Charmless nostalgia-bait

    I wanted to love this. It feels sacrilege to criticise something as culturally precious to us Brits as Wallace & Gromit, but given the astronomical standards set by Park & co, I have to be a dissenting voice here amid the glowing praise.

    This felt like a charmless facsimile of W&G, a fan-made production where everything just felt a bit off - IMO not helped by the passing of Peter Sallis, who is replaced with Ben Whitehead's accurate but soulless Sallis impression.

    That's not to denigrate the incredible craft and skill involved in making a film like this, it all looks great. Almost too great.

    The problem however lies in the script, the story, and the bizarre dearth of any of the warmth or 'detail' we've come to expect from Aardman.

    Anton Deck? Onya Doorstep? Up North News? Come on guys. This is first-draft energy. This is not funny or clever enough to be worthy of an Aardman production. It has the cadence of being funny without being at all funny.

    The jokes - of which there are few - all fall flat, with an almost desperate overreliance on slapstick to compensate for this.

    Also, did Park and co just lift the main plot driver straight out of that evil Krusty doll episode of Treehouse of Horror?

    The whole story and plot feels unusually generic, like they're just going through the motions & phoning it in. At best it feels like a lazy rehash of the same formula we've seen many times before. At worst, this is a cynical nostalgia-bait corporate cash-grab that feels like it was written by one of the film's gnomes.

    I hate that I am writing this, but I was just so underwhelmed and disappointed. And on Christmas Day, no less. I feel betrayed.



    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Klare
    replied
    I was very impressed with it, Graham! I was a little worried that this one was going to be pure CGI, but it turns out that when Aardman found out the factory that made their clay was going out of business, they bought as much as they needed to make this movie! (Word is they are working on finding a new source, too!)

    What's nice here is they brought in a lot of elements from the other stories. so it feels like you are slipping on a favorite pair of shoes: familiar and comfortable. They left a plot line dangling at the end which means to me they'd better lock in that new source of clay too!

    (Yet: what became of their orange lunar rocket?)

    Wallace has a "new" voice, since his original voice actor passed away some years ago. What's nice is he's so close that I only remembered this after the movie was over.

    The animation it great! There is a typical Wallace and Gromit style chase between two canal boats and at one point they emerge from a tunnel and find themselves out over a deep valley on a high aqueduct. It was an awesome sight on a big screen.

    There is a robotic gnome in the movie. Armed with this fact, the writers inserted many "gnome" puns. For example, Wallace has a tracking system to find out where the gnome is. He calls it a "gnoming device".

    This was my son's idea. I can hook the "theater" into the cable box just fine, but it was his NetFlix account and he discovered it was available. I taught him how to thread up a 16mm projector and during our last show, he was Associate Projectionist during a 8mm-16mm changeover (My arms aren't long enough, nor would I ever want them to be!), but when you get into this stuff, it's his century, not mine and I let him contribute what he knows!

    Leave a comment:


  • Graham Ritchie
    replied
    I am still keeping an eye out Steve for that one, its not been released out here yet.

    Last night it was a visit to the past with the blu-ray of Gran Torino hard to believe that its been now 16 years since we screening the 35mm print. At the time we had a young projectionist who was 15 years old Gran Torino had a "R16 restricted to 16 years and over" if I remember right. I also remember asking the downstairs staff if they would look the other way if he came in through the exit door to watch it in the cinema, which they did good movie to.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X