Originally posted by Jason Quinn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wolverine-Hawkeye Telecine
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by John Kennedy View Post
Hi Stan. Those kind words mean a great deal to me coming from someone with your undoubted wisdom and experience.
Funnily enough, the standard 8 footage from the sixties seems to fare much better on my Wolverine than super 8 from a decade or so later.
I have no idea why...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bruce Davis View PostHi All, good to see so much activity, I was just playing around with Photomatix HDR and used two of Stan's images 811.tiff 812.tiff, with standard settings in Photomatrix ans selected the Natural option.
By the way Stan the images I downloaded from https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...zT00JewKQT0GhS are actually in BMP format not TIFF.
then there is this free plug in for Final Cut Pro X https://blog.alex4d.com/2012/12/18/a...c-lantern-hdr/
last night i did try to do the hdr of Stan's image sequence in Final Cut 7 maybe i post something about it if i get it to work good
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Kennedy View Post
Hi Jason.
having watched your upload, I think you need to adjust the sharpness to medium. It is instinctively natural to opt for the high setting as we desire to maximise the quality but the high setting is simply too much. Also, the whites on the film seem a little bleached to me. I would adjust the exposure down to minus 1. Keep the picture as small as possible and don't use the inbuilt cropping tool as this causes deterioration to the picture.
A very nice man named James G Brown has a thread on the forum which links to a tool he has developed to adjust the speed of the film and to crop the unwanted edges. It is invaluable.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Enfuse version 4.2 works very good on Stan´s image sequence HDR you can download it here http://enblend.sourceforge.net/enfus...ml/enfuse.html
it´s a command line tool here is the code
Code:enfuse.exe --soft-mask --exposure-weight=1.0 --saturation-weight=0.2 --contrast-weight=0.0 --entropy-weight=0.0 --exposure-optimum=0.4 --exposure-width=0.2 -v -o "D:\output\output.tif" "D:\ODD\image10.tiff" "D:\EVEN\image10.tiff"
here is my .bat file code loop for image sequence image1.tiff image2.tiff image3.tiff and so on to image452.tiff
Code:SET Input_PATCH1=D:\EVEN SET Input_PATCH2=D:\ODD SET OUTPUT_PATCH=D:\output SET start=1 SET end=452 FOR /L %%i IN (%start%,1,%end%) DO (CALL :loopbody "%%i") GOTO :eof :loopbody enfuse.exe --soft-mask --exposure-weight=1.0 --saturation-weight=0.2 --contrast-weight=0.0 --entropy-weight=0.0 --exposure-optimum=0.4 --exposure-width=0.2 -v -o "%OUTPUT_PATCH%\image%1.tiff" "%Input_PATCH1%\image%1.tiff" "%Input_PATCH2%\image%1.tiff" GOTO :eof
but Enfuse does not work good at all on my camera captures looks very bad that is very strange have to try more settings
Enfuse 4.2 HDR output examples
Last edited by Mattias Norberg; July 25, 2020, 04:15 PM.
Comment
-
You hit the nail on the head Mattias. Wow, that made a big difference.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/9H6hYFpEDaWrGHJz8
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan Jelavic View Post
Thanks Jason. I am dissecting the code and the script but that takes time. I thing I have enough parts for at least 5 kits but will double check.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan Jelavic View PostYou hit the nail on the head Mattias. Wow, that made a big difference.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/9H6hYFpEDaWrGHJz8
im trying to get Enfuse 4.2 to work with my camera capture files but it does not work good i thought first that it was the sprocket hole but that was not it i think i have to big step on my High and Low exposure capture
for me right now Avisynth HDR script works best
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jason Quinn View Post
Stan, Question, how does the mod do with skin tones? The existing Wolverine Standard and Pro camera sometimes gives a yellowish tint. Assuming with that new camera it would give a more natural tone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan Jelavic View PostMattias, Avisynth improves my clips also but Enfuse is definitely better. Will try a few more videos.
Code:a=ImageSource("F:\LOW_exposure\image%d.ppm",start=1,end=3662,fps=18).RGBAdjust(rg=1.4, gg=1.4, bg=1.4).ConvertToYUY2() b=ImageSource("F:\HIGH_exposure\image%d.ppm",start=1,end=3662,fps=18).RGBAdjust(rg=1.4, gg=1.4, bg=1.4).ConvertToYUY2()
RGBAdjust(rg=1.4, gg=1.4, bg=1.4) default is RGBAdjust(rg=1.0, gg=1.0, bg=1.0) i think when i use the Fast gpu debayer the gamma is very low but that pump on the gamma was very good for my camera captures now i maybe must redo my films
and i did only use HDRAGC only on the LOW_exposure inside HDR1 function at the beginning
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan Jelavic View Post
Comment
-
Hi Mattias, your results with Enfuse are very good.
Hi Jason, the original DFM 72BUC02-ML camera used with Hawkeye does have a more bluish tint if you look at the background, the Wolverine although darker does seem to have a better overall colour balance, but then you were only interested in skin tone. If you are going to upgrade your Wolverine it might be worthwhile looking at the Sony board cameras, yes they are more expensive, but better colour balance.
Regards - Bruce
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bruce Davis View PostHi Mattias, your results with Enfuse are very good.
Hi Jason, the original DFM 72BUC02-ML camera used with Hawkeye does have a more bluish tint if you look at the background, the Wolverine although darker does seem to have a better overall colour balance, but then you were only interested in skin tone. If you are going to upgrade your Wolverine it might be worthwhile looking at the Sony board cameras, yes they are more expensive, but better colour balance.
Regards - Bruce
Comment
Comment