Author
|
Topic: What Films did you show last night?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Akshay Nanjangud
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 637
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2011
|
posted February 13, 2012 01:52 AM
Laksmi, when you frame the question like that, Kong eating folks does seem innocuous. Here are some thoughts:
1. My memories of black-and-white films are rather pure. You see, the movies of Buster Keaton, Chaplin, Capra, Hitchcock are all rather classic in their approach. Even the horror titles Nosferatu and The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari are polished. King Kong seemed to me more raw. (Let's say I was let down) 2. So, I started King Kong expecting a classical treatment. It turned out raw, very violent. So, the film surprised me! I love stereotypes being broken! (Let's now say I was impressed) 3. I like your comparison to Jurassic Park. It's true that dinosaurs eat each other, but there is only one scene where the T-Rex eats a human. Even that scene has a hint of comedy when a man relieving himself on the pot is swallowed by a T-Rex. So, I feel there is a difference. 4. Now consider Peter Jackson's King Kong where Kong is more like a dog wanting to be his master (mistress maybe since it's Naomi). There is a sorrow when Kong falls from the Empire State Builing in Peter Jackson's version. There is no such sorrow for Kong in the 1933 version.
Perhaps the film's intent was to stir a repulsion and if so I did feel it. It was horrifying. Whatever it was, I liked the movie. What more, my wife loved it and it's a huge relief considering what I paid for it!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Osi Osgood
Film God
Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted February 13, 2012 12:53 PM
Indias notorious for it's protection of it's image around the world, when it comes to film-makers going there to film.
When Speilberg was making "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom", he had his people bargaining and bargaining to shoot in India, and the indian authorities were coming up with objection after objection, wanting to rewrite the script, ect. The straw that broke Speilbergs proverbial "back" was when the Indianj authorities were demanding that Speilberg couldn't say the name of India's ruler in thier film ...
So they shot in Sri Lanka instead, (which looks nearly Identical to India), and India now had absolutely no say as to how they were made to look in the film.
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dino Everette
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1535
From: Long Beach, CA USA
Registered: Dec 2008
|
posted February 14, 2012 12:40 AM
I have been away for too long, and I love this Kong thread, as I agree that every kid is different. I started watching horror movies at a very early age and I think I was given the proper context on things like King Kong about what is real and what is make believe, and everything you watch on a screen is make believe, so none of it ever scared me, but my sister was always terrified by those same movies...2 kids, same upbringing, same information, and 2 different reactions to scary movies...
Oh and Laksmi, sorry I did not answer you, but the key is really just take enough pics so you will guarantee some will be in focus, since you are dealing with images that are moving, so most will be blurry.
So finally getting myself back to business and watching some movies. Tonight was a feature and a short. First was a silent short on standard 8mm entitled MAD DANCER (1925, 400 ft Blackhawk)starring dancer Ann Pennington. This one was a Killiam collaboration and had a mixture of Blackhawk historical titles, with the original Burton King titles, with an unusual moral opinionated Killiam title inserted near the end..This was followed by a 16mm western from Republic. A very family oriented title from their Rough Ridin Kids series called THE DAKOTA KID (1951, 2 x 1600ft) where the bad guy gets a conscience and turns his life around.
-------------------- "You're too Far Out Miss Lawrence"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|